The documentary “Cameraperson” was born out of the collapse of another. Kirsten Johnson — a longtime cinematographer and camera operator (she prefers the helpfully vague “cameraperson”) for documentaries like “Citizenfour,” “Fahrenheit 9/11” and “Darfur Now” — was making a film about Afghanistan. However, the footage she had gotten of one of her subjects, a young Afghan teenager, would put her in danger if her neighbors could see it, which they probably could. Johnson realized this quandary would be a subject worth exploring.
And so now we have “Cameraperson,” an experimental doc that uses footage from this aborted film and outtakes and various unused footage from the docs she’s shot over 20-plus years. It’s not a didactic film; quite the opposite. It hops around various footage, various time periods and various locations, as though on shuffle. Along the way you’re quietly confronted with asking pressing questions about what we’re looking at and why, and what it means to turn the camera on a stranger, even if it’s for noble reasons.
Johnson, back in her Manhattan home, spoke to us about being a cameraperson on documentaries and what the film says about our own social media habits.
One of the issues raised in the film is the nature of the relationship between the person filming and the people they’re filming. You often have footage where you’re interacting with subjects, trying to form some kind of relationship with them.
Sometimes the person with the camera is the person is the closest with the subject. We also know that cameras can be intimidating or threatening or upsetting. We’re always questioning and wondering why and how someone wants to be filmed. I see it as my job to make them feel as comfortable as possible, to be themselves in front of the camera. That can mean different things to different people. Sometimes I’m joking around and touching people and being really close to them. Other times I’m extremely respectful and silent.
The film is peppered with scenes of you talking from behind the camera to an Afghan boy in Kabul, where you’re comforting him, trying to get him to relax before he talks about something horrible. Is that often part of your role as a cameraperson?
It is. Part of what’s incredible is you’re sometimes faced with a situation of not being able to understand the language someone is speaking in, but you’re still trying to film them. That certainly was a moment of that. There are other times when I transgress the boundaries of what is actually my relationship. There’s that moment with the Bosnian grandmother where I ask about her fashion sense. That was me not being able to contain myself anymore, because we were pushing her to talk about the war and tried it from different angles. And she really didn’t want to.
That’s another idea in the film: that while it’s important for people to make sure the world knows about their trauma, talking about it or only being defined by it can, in some cases, prolong and exacerbate the trauma.
One of the things I often struggle with is that we’re asking people to tell these emotional stories about some of the most traumatic moments in their lives. But we’re often only talking to people about their moments of victimization. I’m really interested in how we can tell more complex, complete tales of people when they’re only talking about this one terrible moment in their lives. Often I’m pushing back against only showing people as victims.