Metropolitik: The endless campaign ends

Barack Obama and Mitt Romney

Asking a political scientist to write about an election campaign before the results come in is like asking the theater critic to file a review of a play at intermission.  But’s it’s also a good to sit down and ponder – independent of the final voting results — what this campaign has meant and how it has gone.

First, isn’t everyone glad it is over?  We’ve been told that the results depend on “a handful of undecided.”  I’ll bet there are many more undecided than people who are still enjoying this campaign.  The question is, what are the costs and benefits of having a campaign that has been going on full speed since January and, in practice, before that?  Remember, Mitt Romney started to run against Barak Obama almost three years ago.  

Some would say that long campaigns are useful because during them we learn so much more about the candidates and their positions.  It’s hard to make that case this time. I don’t think even Mitt’s most ardent supporter is any clearer on his positions on topics such as the environment, tax allowances, or abortion than when he started out.  

We’ll come back to the financial costs of the campaign, but for now let’s just think about how the length of the campaign has imposed costs in terms of governing – hard choices deferred, compromise subordinated to getting a good sound bite to use in commercials.  This applies to decisions about the government’s budget and the economy, of course, but it also affects decision making on foreign policy.  Other democracies get by with much shorter campaigns.  It really isn’t fundamental to democracy that the system works this way.

Second, it sure was expensive.  The price tag of $6 to $7 billion is huge.  I know it can be argued that we spend as much advertising automobiles or laundry detergent, but there’s no way round the fact that this is a staggering amount of money.  Raising that money takes a lot of time and requires paying a lot of attention to donors that could have been spent on voters.  

In our politics, as in many other aspects of our society, the super rich have gained in importance and leverage.  But there’s plenty of blame to go around here.  

President Obama destroyed the practice of presidential candidates relying on public funding in 2008 when he realized he could raise much more money than public funding would provide.  The Supreme Court’s infamous Citizens United decision in the name of free speech deliberately opened the floodgates to more spending by people or groups laughably said to be independent of the candidates.  People such as Sheldon Adelson have bought themselves plenty of free speech this time around, much of it spent on negative attack ads. By the end of October, Adelson has spent over $54 million going after Obama and promoting Romney.  That’s a lot more “free speech” than most citizens can afford.

Third, the candidates, the parties, and the independent groups certainly continued to believe the experts’ advice that negative advertising works.  Yes, we all say we hate negative advertising, but research shows people remember it.  It’s not surprising therefore that we get so much of it.  Here in Massachusetts we had the odd spectacle of GOP Sen. Scott Brown, even while describing himself as a fence-building moderate, running constant personal attacks on his opponent, Democrat Elizabeth Warren.  A Brown victory would score another one for the argument that going negative and personalistic works.

Fourth, doesn’t this campaign show yet again how pernicious the Electoral College is?  We don’t know yet if the undemocratic difference will re-emerge this year between the popular vote and the Electoral College vote, as we saw in 2000.  We do know that all the attention of the presidential campaigns in the last few weeks has been concentrated on a handful of states.  

Abolishing the Electoral College would force candidates to behave very differently.  We’d have seen Romney campaigning in California and New York because there are a lot of potential Republican voters there.  We’d have seen Obama campaigning in Texas because, although they’re a minority in the state, there are plenty of potential Democratic voters there.  In a USA worried about polarization, wouldn’t this have been good for the country?

So was there anything positive to be learned or said about this campaign?

First, as with military campaigns, the commanders in the next will admire its tactical successes.  Romney’s success in moving to the right to win the Republican nomination in the winter and then back towards the center in the fall will be studied as textbook strategy for presidential candidates in the future.  Democratic hopefuls will wonder if they can be as successful in tacking left and then back to the center in their party.  Every presidential challenger will study and try to emulate Romney’s triumph over Obama in the first debate.  Social scientists may be skeptical that the first debate changed many votes, but it certainly changed the dynamics of the campaign.  We’ll have to see the results before we know if the president’s emphasis on the identify-and-get-out-the-vote ground game paid off.

Second, perhaps more importantly for the country, all the flip-flopping and clever ads could not obscure the fact that underlying this election has been a serious issue.  No, it’s not just the economy.  Yes, the economy matters enormously to people but it’s is not clear that there are real as opposed to rhetorical differences between the two candidates on macroeconomic policy.  The real underlying choice has been about the role of government in our society.

Is government an important tool for stabilizing the economy, advancing social justice, and protecting things that affect us all such as the environment?  Or is government an impediment to growth and prosperity through excessive taxation and regulation?  While Romney in the fall campaign backed away from the extremism of the Tea Party wing of the Republican Party, there’s little doubt that a Romney administration would have different priorities in this regard than President Obama’s.  

Asked if they want lower taxes or government services, Americans in recent decades have refused to choose and demanded both.  The difference has been met by borrowing, often from overseas.  Many Americans finally sense that this cannot go on forever and the moment of choice is nearing.  That’s what makes this campaign so significant and so hard fought.

And finally, let’s take a moment to think positive thoughts about the candidates and their supporters.  At the presidential level, the candidates and their families have been put through a level of scrutiny that simply doesn’t exist in the private sector.  But I’m not just referring primarily of the presidential candidates here.  

I’m thinking of people like my friend, Deb, running for State Assembly in New Hampshire standing in the cold and rain at the town dump every Saturday and Sunday instead of curling up on the sofa watching the Patriots.  I’m thinking of the young volunteers on both sides who sleep on floors or airbeds while working away from home to help their candidates in crucial swing states.  These are the people we should thank for making our democracy work — not the billionaires dropping millions on negative ads.

-Wilson is chairman of Department of Political Science at Boston University.


News
Entertainment
Sports
Lifestyle
National

On newly released tape, 'Squeaky' Fromme says was…

By Alex DobuzinskisLOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A one-time follower of mass murderer Charles Manson who in 1975 tried to assassinate then-President Gerald Ford told a…

National

Electric Zoo tickets on sale Tuesday as festival…

Electric Zoo tickets go on sale Tuesday. The festival announced plans to amp up security after two attendees died last year from apparent drug overdoses.

Local

VIDEO: Conflicting accounts after horse carriage falls over…

There were conflicting accounts about what caused a horse carriage to fall near Central Park and Fifth Avenue on Wednesday.

Local

Bronx Zoo welcomes 2 newborn gorillas

Rounding the number of western lowland gorillas up to 20, the two tots are the first born at the Bronx Zoo since 2006.

Going Out

Pop-up cat cafe opens to long lines in…

The country's first pop-up cat cafe opened in New York on Thursday.

Movies

Interview: Steven Knight on making Tom Hardy normal…

Filmmaker Steven Knight discusses his new movie "Locke," set entirely within a car and featuring only one actor on-screen: Tom Hardy.

Movies

Interview: 'The Quiet Ones' star Sam Claflin on…

"Hunger Games" co-star Sam Claflin talks about his new horror film "The Quiet Ones," plus how technology connects him with fans.

Entertainment

Here's what to do in New York City…

ART Opening Reception for Gerson Leiber’s Rites of Spring: A Modernist View of Nature Tonight, 6 p.m. Carter Burden Gallery 548 West 28th Street #534…

NFL

2014 NFL Mock Draft: Updated, new April 24…

2014 NFL Mock Draft: Updated, new April 24 version

MLB

5 infamous pitcher ejections for cheating

Never fear Yankees fans, Michael Pineda is far from the first MLB pitcher to be thrown out of a game for cheating.

MLB

Yankees pitcher Michael Pineda ejected for using pine…

Pineda was thrown out of the game against the Red Sox Wednesday for having pine tar on his neck -- for all the world to see.

NFL

Giants 2014 regular season schedule

The Giants will play five prime-time games — against the Lions, Redskins, Eagles, Colts and Cowboys.

Parenting

New study: Inside the wage gap between boys…

According to a new study, there's a wage gap between boys and girls, with boys earning more allowance for less chores.

Tech

From Apple TV to Fire TV, big changes…

Apple is set to launch a new generation of it's Apple TV, which grossed over $1 billion in 2013. But competition from Amazon and Google looms.

Style

Katy Perry releases a new Claire’s collection

Katy Perry expands her empire by releasing an accessories collection at Claire's.

Style

MAC & Proenza Schouler collection unveiled

MAC Cosmetics is releasing a new collection with Proenza Schouler.