When Governor Deval Patrick recently unveiled his new Education Action Agenda, media did not focus on the new achievement standards for students contained within the 44-page report, but rather on the 44 words supporting in-state tuition rates for undocumented immigrants. Illegal immigrants make for splashy headlines, but reorganizing public education in Massachusetts apparently is a yawn.
It’s incredible that the largest increase to public education funding in the Massachusetts since Education Reform passed in 1993 would be side-tracked by a policy already the law of the land in Texas, Kansas and Arkansas.
Yes, that would be the Arkansas of former Governor and Republican Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee who approved a similar measure for undocumented students when he led the state.
Advocates for the in-state tuition proposal here would allow the children of undocumented immigrants — many of whom were brought here when they were toddlers — to pay the same rate as other in-state residents provided they graduated from a Massachusetts high school and pass the MCAS exam.
But since the immigration debate has become so frenzied, change appears near impossible with an uncooperative legislature and a local media intent on hysteria. Worse, the mere mention of the issue has aroused passions could derail the entire package.
“All those good ideas could go down in flames because he’s included in-state tuition,” said Rep. Kevin Murphy, co-chairman of the legislative Higher Education committee who represents Lowell, a city that is almost one quarter foreign-born.
While the media and some lawmakers carped on that single provision, the Governor’s education plan deserves a fairer public scrutiny. The study notes the alarmingly low rate of students statewide who earn college degrees in Massachusetts — only 3 or 4 out of 10 who start as high school freshmen — at a time when the economy puts a premium on higher education. It also proposes a “Readiness Passport” for students to track progress through a more comprehensive education system.
Sure, no plan is perfect and the funding details are forthcoming, but we need a broader debate. It’s insulting to extract one topic guaranteed to fan the flames when the alarming economic disparities in the state’s education system need to be solved.
Those are the flames, Mr. Representative, that consume good ideas.
Mark Puleo is co-editor of the Brazilian Journal, a bilingual publication in Greater New England.