Bush tempers criticism on stalled Mideast democracy, says Iran poses danger – Metro US

Bush tempers criticism on stalled Mideast democracy, says Iran poses danger

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates – U.S. President George W. Bush gently nudged authoritarian Arab allies Sunday to satisfy frustrated desires for democracy in the Middle East and saved his harshest criticism for Iran, branding it “the world’s leading state-sponsor of terror.”

Speaking in this Persian Gulf country, just 250 kilometres from the shores of Iran, Bush said Tehran threatens countries everywhere and that the United States was “rallying friends around the world to confront this danger before it is too late.”

The warning about Iran was much tougher than Bush’s admonition about spreading democracy in the Middle East, which had been billed as the central theme of his speech.

In a region of autocratic rulers, Bush did not single out any country for criticism. He spoke about democracy in a deeply undemocratic country, the U.A.E., where an elite of royal rulers makes virtually all the decisions. Large numbers of foreign resident workers have few legal or human rights, including no right to protest working conditions.

“To the people of the Middle East: We hear your cries for justice,” Bush said. “We share your desire for a free and prosperous future. And as you struggle to find your voice and make your way in this world, the United States will stand with you.”

Usually averse to sightseeing, Bush rode out into the sand dunes to the desert encampment of Abu Dhabi’s crown prince, Sheik Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan. He let Bush hold one of his prize falcons. Later, Bush returned to his suite in the opulent Emirates Palace Hotel, constructed at a cost of more than $3 billion and reputed to be the most expensive hotel ever built.

The next stop on Bush’s eight-day journey is the neighbouring emirate of Dubai, part of the U.A.E., where the government has declared a public holiday Monday to avoid traffic chaos during the tour.

He will then go to Saudi Arabia, where King Abdullah, has tried to push some reforms on education and women’s rights, and there have been limited municipal council elections. But he has been cautious and limited in his efforts, apparently hampered by others in the royal family worried that fast changes could upset the country’s conservative clerics and citizens.

In Egypt, the last country Bush planned to visit, the democracy effort has stalled badly. The opposition candidate, Ayman Nour, who ran against longtime President Hosni Mubarak in the first multiparty elections, remains jailed on what many critics view as trumped-up criminal fraud charges.

Bush’s blistering words about Iran appeared intended to reassure Arab allies about U.S. readiness to confront Tehran. There have been doubts about Washington’s intentions because of a new U.S. intelligence report that said Iran had stopped pursuing nuclear weapons in 2003.

Bush appeared to put the danger posed by Iran on par with that from al-Qaida, which the U.S. national intelligence director, Mike McConnell has said is America’s greatest threat.

“One cause of instability is the extremists supported and embodied by the regime that sits in Tehran,” Bush said. “Iran is today the world’s leading state sponsor of terror.

Bush said Iran funds militant groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad and sends arms to the Taliban in Afghanistan and Shiite extremists in Iraq. “The other major cause of instability is the extremists embodied by al-Qaida and its affiliates,” he said.

His words brought a stern response from Iran’s foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, to end what he called U.S. meddling.

“Mr. Bush has tried unsuccessfully to undermine our relations with the countries of the region. We believe his mission has totally failed. We have making strides in building ties with the region, politically, economically and even in security,” Mottaki told the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television. “It is much better if the Americans had stopped intervening in the region’s affair.”

-With files from The Canadian Press.

More from our Sister Sites