Home
 
Choose Your City
Change City

Monster effects, mini budget

Filmmaker Gareth Edwards is as confused as anyone about why Hollywood’s special effects blockbusters cost millions of dollars to make.

Filmmaker Gareth Edwards is as confused as anyone about why Hollywood’s special effects blockbusters cost millions of dollars to make.

“I’d love for you to ask that same question to (Hollywood producers) and say, ‘Why is it so expensive?’” says the Emmy-nominated visual-effects-prodigy-turned-director. “Essentially it’s a guy on a computer in a room doing it. Who’s getting the $10 million?”

With the thriller “Monsters,” Edwards is defying convention with his own sci-fi blockbuster that features a Mexico overrun by enormous octopus-like aliens. Impressively slick, the first-time filmmaker has proven that you can craft incredible effects that don’t rely on an Avatar-sized bankroll.

“I genuinely don’t know [how much it cost],” Edwards admitted, while insisting Internet rumors the price tag was as low as $15,000 are false. “We all got paid a wage so there’s no way it could’ve been done for that, but probably the budget could’ve been close to that in terms of what was spent onscreen. It was a very low budget.”

“Monsters” isn’t only attracting attention for its cost-effective effects, however. Comparing the film to “District 9,” critics are taking note of the movie’s political subtext regarding American security and border policies — a distinction Edwards quickly downplays.

“It’s really much more a case [that] I wanted to do this monster movie, but I wanted it to be real and so you pull from real-world situations,” says Edwards, “but there’s a lot of little parallels in there.?And I’m very happy for them to be there because I didn’t want to make a film that was [just] entertainment.”