LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) – France is entitled to bring criminal proceedings against local managers of ride-hailing app Uber [UBER.UL] for running an illegal taxi service, the EU top court ruled on Tuesday, dealing the Silicon Valley start-up another legal setback.
Uber’s loss follows an earlier one last year where the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) classified the company as a transport service rather than a digital one, which stripped it of protections against undue national regulation that digital services enjoy under EU law.
The latest case concerned Uber’s use of unlicensed drivers as part of its UberPOP service in France, which has since been suspended there and in several other cities. Uber still uses its service with professional licensed drivers in France, which is not affected by the ruling.
“Member states may prohibit and punish, as a matter of criminal law, the illegal exercise of transport activities in the context of the UberPOP service, without notifying the Commission in advance of the draft legislation,” the ECJ said in a statement.
Uber had argued that France should have sought the European Commission’s approval for a new taxi law, which contained measures on taxis and mobility apps, including one that said only official taxis could use geolocation technology to show available cars.
As France did not seek the Commission’s approval Uber argued that criminal charges brought against two of the company’s French managers were not valid.
“This case is about whether a French law from 2014 should have been pre-notified to the European Commission and related to peer-to-peer services which we stopped in 2015,” a spokeswoman for Uber said. “As our new CEO has said, it is appropriate to regulate services such as Uber and so we will continue the dialogue with cities across Europe.”
Uber, which allows users to summon a ride through an app on their smartphones, has roiled the traditional taxi industry since it launched in Europe in 2011, triggering protests and clashes with local authorities.
It recently adopted a more conciliatory approach, voluntarily suspending its services in some cities to comply with local legislation.
It has also been forced to quit countries such as Denmark and Hungary.
Under EU law, national legislation affecting digital services needs to be pre-notified to Brussels to ensure it is not distorting the single market.
The ECJ said that since Uber was offering a transport service under EU law the obligation to notify the Commission in advance did not apply.
Last year, London deemed Uber unfit to run a taxi service and stripped it of its license to operate. Uber is appealing against the decision.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) – which represents major technology companies, including Uber – said the importance of the case went beyond the ride-hailing app.
“It is about the Commission’s effective oversight powers, and we regret to see those being curtailed after today’s judgment,” said Jakob Kucharczyk, Vice President, Competition & EU Regulatory Policy at CCIA.
“Unfortunately, the Court has given member states more room to thwart the Digital Single Market through restrictive, disproportionate and unjustified measures at national level.”
(Reporting by Michele Sinner, writing by Julia Fioretti; Editing by Alastair Macdonald, Susan Fenton and Jane Merriman)
