Connecticut sues Exxon for deceiving consumers about climate change – Metro US

Connecticut sues Exxon for deceiving consumers about climate change

FILE PHOTO: A view of the Exxon Mobil refinery in
FILE PHOTO: A view of the Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, Texas

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Connecticut filed a lawsuit on Monday against oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp for misleading the public over the impacts of climate change, becoming the latest state to target the fossil fuel industry for violating state consumer protection laws.

The state’s attorney general William Tong filed the lawsuit in Connecticut’s Superior Court, alleging that Exxon violated the state’s unfair trade practices act, deceiving Connecticut consumers about what the company knew about fossil fuels’ impact on climate change.

“Exxon Mobil made billions of dollars during its decades-long campaign of deception that continues today,” said Attorney General Tong, adding that the state “should not have to bear the expense of fortifying our infrastructure to adapt to the very real consequences of climate change.”

Over the last few months, attorneys general from Massachusetts, Minnesota, the District of Columbia and Delaware have sued members of the fossil fuel industry, accusing companies of violating state laws by deceiving consumers about harms caused by their products.

Exxon spokesman Casey Norton said the company will defend itself in court and continue to invest in efforts to reduce emissions.

“Legal proceedings like this waste millions of dollars of taxpayer money and do nothing to advance meaningful actions that reduce the risks of climate change,” Norton said.

Unlike other states’ lawsuits, which either target multiple companies or trade groups or highlight bring up other violations like fraud, Connecticut’s is focused on one company and one law.

Tong will examine “all of Exxon Mobil’s deceptions dating back decades” as well as the company’s current advertising and marketing, which he says falsely portray Exxon as working to combat climate change.

The state is seeking “remediation for past, present and future harm from climate change,” restitution for investments it had to make to adapt to climate change, disgorgement of corporate profits, and establishment of a “third-party controlled education fund” on climate change, among other relief.

(Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Marguerita Choy)