By Christoph Steitz and Vera Eckert
FRANKFURT (Reuters) – RWE
Germany’s exit from the coal industry marks the second major upheaval for RWE in as many years following the breakup of the company’s former subsidiary Innogy
It also accelerates RWE’s transformation into a pure renewables group, which — along with its low valuation — could turn it into a takeover target, Goldman Sachs said last week.
RWE said it would receive 2.6 billion euros ($2.9 billion) in compensation from the government over 15 years to soften the blow to its business, but added that this was less than the 3.5 billion euro hit it estimated it would take, even excluding the expected loss of profits.
“RWE stretches to the limits of what is possible,” Chief Executive Rolf Martin Schmitz told journalists on a call. “And we will bear the majority of the burden the German government demands for the coal phase-out.”
After months of wrangling, the German government early on Thursday agreed a compensation plan with energy companies, affected regions and workers to pay for the accelerated shutdown of coal-fired power stations by 2038.
RWE said it expected special writedowns of half a billion euros on power plants and opencast mines as a result of the agreement. About 350 million euros will be set aside for personnel measures.
Shares in the group were 2% higher at 1508 GMT, the second-biggest gainers among German blue-chips, having earlier touched their highest level since Sept. 25, 2014 as traders welcomed the clarity after months of wrangling.
“RWE’s agreement with the German government lifts an important overhang as some investors were cautious on whether RWE would be able to receive adequate compensation for early mine closures, given the past track record of negotiations with the government,” Bernstein analysts wrote.
Schmitz denied speculation that RWE may now seek to sell its coal assets, adding the group, which is also Europe’s third-largest renewable group after Iberdrola
“There are no such considerations and no talks on the matter,” Schmitz said.
The company has in the past denied claims that its coal-fired plants are loss-making, saying it would not run them unless they generated cash.
(Editing by Michelle Martin; Kirsten Donovan)